First off, I’d like to start with commending you on your skills with numerology and usage of a variety of fields to support your theory. The skills you have definitely contribute to your ability to provide a strong argument.

However, I have issues with your claims. Let’s begin:

First, let me discuss why I feel that your claim about aliens and extra-dimensional beings is wrong. For any being looking to travel the cosmos, they need two things (though the second is less relevant if they can find ways around it): energy and time. It takes a tremendous amount of energy to travel far distances in the universe, more energy to protect your craft from universal harm, and even more if you have a way of getting around the immense amount of time it takes for conventional space travel (“conventional” meaning that you travel directly from point to point, as how we travel from the Earth to the moon). This implies that any alien race capable of reaching us directly would have to be FAR advanced in comparison to us. Why would such an advanced race be concerned with us, a tiny, unsophisticated group of organisms living on a back-water planet? They might respect our intelligence, but would otherwise view us as insignificant. They would have no need for treaties with us simply because they would have the might to destroy us on a whim. It would also be impossible for them to live with us (unless they constantly used sophisticated suits, which would be possible) simply because of the spread of disease. Even if they could survive by breathing in our atmosphere, direct exposure would cause either the alien, us, or both to become victim to a disease that neither immune system could possibly fight against (think of how the Europeans spread disease to Native Americans by simply coming here). Disease alone would cause sever problems. This makes the theory of “them living among us” highly unlikely to practically impossible. When it comes to fifth-dimensional beings, do you mean beings of this universe that exist in the fifth dimension, or beings of another universe? If you mean the first, then the idea is instantly debunk. There is (as far as we know) any way for cross-dimensional travel. Also, they would be “among” us, but we would have no idea of it because they exist on another dimensional plane. For example: a first dimensional being (so something that exists as a line) has a concept of an extra dimension (the dimension of width) but cannot grasp the dimension beyond (our dimension, so length, width, and height). We are similar to this, in that we are aware of the fourth dimension (time) but cannot control it. Since we have no control over the fourth dimension, we can’t begin to imagine (let alone manipulate) the fifth. This makes it nearly impossible for us to have any awareness of a fifth-dimensional being’s existence except for the belief that it exists. Now, if you meant beings from another universe, you have another huge problem. You would either need tremendous know-how and energy to cross dimensions (which supports the idea that they would not care for our existence) or they would have to exploit any rips in the fabric of space that would allow travel possible. The only thing I can think of is the theory that a black hole has a subsequent white hole, in which the black hole absorbs matter and the white hole spews it forth. If this is true, and a white hole exists in another universe other than the universe with the black hole, you have problems. It would most likely be a one way trip, and (there is a theory on this) that white holes produce new universes. So, the act of finding a way of going between dimensions is extremely difficult.

My next problem with your argument is the belief that there is a group seeking to control the world. To pull off such a large scale conspiracy (that has symbolism, as you claim, in many forms of popular media as subliminal messaging) would require too many people (normal people at that) for it to remain secretive. Yes, governments do keep secrets, but they keep them by having only a few people privy to the sensitive information. A secret is better kept when it is between as few people as possible. Also, does the desire for uniting the world under one world order make that desire evil? A government is the by-product of one, central authority gaining control of a population for the sake of preserving order (or at least that’s how originally started). A one-world government would be similar; it would be a centralized authority whose job would be to preserve order among countries. All institutions (government, science, religion, etc.) are only as good/corrupt as the people in it. If you look to the UN as the beginning of an “evil” new world order, then you must know how unorganized and cohesive it truly is. Member states vote down UN resolutions all the time because they go against that states political agenda (in the case of China, they vote down anything that examines human rights abuses, wonder why…). It’s far from having enough sway to allow an “evil agenda” to exist and operate smoothly.

The other problem with your argument comes in the form of biased data gathering. By that, I mean that you are simply looking for evidence to support your claims, ignoring anything that goes against it. By claiming that contrary data is “propaganda” is a simple way to make those bits of information null and void. That isn’t providing an argument by examining both sides and taking a stance, that is simple editing to only make your claims valid. This means that any argument, any viewpoint, can be claimed “legitimate” by its author. I could argue that dolphins and whales are seeking to take over the world by only looking for anything that would support that claim (yes, that argument is a little strange, but you understand the point). The argument’s entire foundation is based on hear-say, biased examining, and selective research.

Now suppose that all of your claims are true. How, then, do we fight against it? There is a long list of problems, but no solution to fix it and avoid such a terrible event. If it’s unavoidable, then why even bother writing the post? If it is avoidable (or we can fight against it at least) then where are your solutions? Such a post only creates fear and irrational thinking, not intellectual discussion and problem solving.

My warning to you (and to the readers): not everything you read, especially on the internet, is factual and true. Anyone (especially on the internet) can make sensational claims that have no evidence or basis. Reading and gathering information without examining it critically is dangerous. It is blinding yourself intellectually.

That is all, feel free to comment!